"Tomeh, Husam" <htomeh@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > ThanksTom. I've asked the SA to bounce the server thinking it may be a > memory fragmentation issue on the server. After bouncing the server, I > was able to run vacuum successfully. (Before bouncing the server, I > tried a lower value of maintenance_work_mem of 512MB and vacuum worked > fine which made me feel better the status of data not being corrupted). > Do you agree with me at this point that it's not a data corruption > issue? Thanks again. No, I don't, unless you have fields in the database that *should* be 1-billion-and-change bytes long. regards, tom lane
