Continuent Sequoia + PGCluster
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Continuent Sequoia + PGCluster
- From: Rodrigo Hjort <rodrigo.hjort@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 01:03:04 -0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=HyIDD+l2gewEVa0QsVmRn6AQc50vu36DOGwgobdTr27zK9dKXiCyhHg0xnY2ONhTRd4Ji52EybgG78Zj+oW0mFe6qSk3xEhjK69V+zgKJBMpz+R8kgqvOKzf6U45sMScEFt7wizmg9Lo1aaEYycpjMKAWMOP2Nr8Dv9lTMYOqyU=
As I saw past threads about Sequoia (former C-JDBC), I tell you that we're testing it on the company.
My first impression is that it works with ease and transparency to the application.
We still couldn't find a benchmark application to evaluate its
performance fall, since it's based on JDBC connection... Maybe we gotta
build a simpler app in order to do it.
Does anyone already use Sequoia for High Availability and Load Balancing?
How about PGCluster - the patch on PostgreSQL?
--
Regards,
Rodrigo Hjort
[Index of Archives]
[KVM ARM]
[KVM ia64]
[KVM ppc]
[Virtualization Tools]
[Spice Development]
[Libvirt]
[Libvirt Users]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Questions]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]
[XFree86]