Re: ERROR: could not read block

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If I have followed the chain correctly, I saw that you were trying to run an update statement on a large number of records in a large table right? I have changed my strategy in the past for this type of problem. I don't know if it would have fixed this problem or not, but I have seen with Postgres and Oracle that updates like this on a large table may take very long and cause contention processes.

Anyway, the method I normally use is to write a script that selects the records into a cursor and updates one at a time by the primary key, and then committing the transaction every so often (i.e. 500 - 1000 records). This way there will not be the overhead associated with an extremely large transaction, and the script will complete much faster (I have seen hours vs. minutes).

Hope this helps.

Kevin

Kevin Grittner wrote:

I got the error log working on Windows (with redirect_stderr).  I had
to stop and restart postgres to do so.  I ran the query (for the fourth
time), and it completed successfully.

I'm not inclined to believe that changing the redirect_stderr setting
would change this behavior, so I guess that either it is a
coincidence or the restart cleared some bad state within postgres.

Is there anything that anyone wants me to do at this point, to try
to pin down a cause, or do I drop it here?

-Kevin



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux