On Friday 23 September 2005 01:51, Scott Marlowe seinde rooksignalen: > Instead of using a general purpose account, why not give everyone an > account, then make them a member of a group, and give that group the > access. > > That way you can easily add / remove people from the group instead of > trying to do it this way. not an option, its for scripting and testing purposes > > Otherwise, don't use a password, set the machine to use trust or ident or > something like that where a password wouldn't matter. although it is then a user/pasword known by a lot of people, it is still beter than no password > > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Wim Bertels > Sent: Thu 9/22/2005 6:13 PM > To: pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: alter user > > Ls, > > any user can change his own password, > i haven't found a way of prohibiting this. > what about a general user (eg test/test), that is used by many people, > one of those people could use alter user (being connected as test/test) the > change the password, leaving the rest clueless.. > > suggestions to prevent this?, i need a general (readonly) user! -- Wim Bertels
Attachment:
pgpvcOdV8bHVO.pgp
Description: signature
