Tom Lane wrote: > This has been discussed before (try the pgsql-jdbc list archives). > I believe we concluded that an appropriate fix was to not consider the > cancel request "done" until the client sees the separate connection > dropped by the postmaster. libpq's cancel functions wait for that to > happen, and I thought that JDBC had been fixed as well --- maybe you are > using an old driver version? I thought this got done too, but looking at the current JDBC driver code I don't see it.. -O ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster