Re: VACUUM - How long should it take?! - Here are some test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>bgwriter_percent = 0
>>bgwriter_maxpages = 0

> Why did you do that?  There's certainly nothing in the docs recommending
> disabling the bgwriter.

I'm remembering that putting big data into the database ran faster with
this settings.

>>The duration of the VACUUM of tbl1 and tbl2 is okay - so how to speed up
>>now the VACUUM of tbl3?
>
>
> You have not showed us anything that would explain any speed differences
> between these tables.  Maybe there was some difference in the data you
> loaded them with?

The strings in the tbl3 are longer - I took the average length from the
original table which is about 94 characters.

I will make some tests with increasing the data in tbl3 with 100k,
1 Million and 100 Million rows.

I'll also try activating the bgwriter.

The other settings in postgresql.conf look for you ok?

Some other information
----------------------

Distribution: Debian
Encoding of Database: LATIN10
Locale: C

Regards, Aldor

Tom Lane wrote:
> Aldor <an@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>>bgwriter_percent = 0
>>bgwriter_maxpages = 0
> 
> 
> Why did you do that?  There's certainly nothing in the docs recommending
> disabling the bgwriter.
> 
> 
>>The duration of the VACUUM of tbl1 and tbl2 is okay - so how to speed up
>>now the VACUUM of tbl3?
> 
> 
> You have not showed us anything that would explain any speed differences
> between these tables.  Maybe there was some difference in the data you
> loaded them with?
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux