On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:56:36PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Aldor wrote: > >I'm still wondering why you first query takes about 4107.987 ms - this > >kind of query has usually have to run much much faster. > > That would work if I were to get really occasional high values in syslog, > but this is almost a consist thing over a very short period of time: Are the updates happening inside a transaction? Is it possible that they're being blocked by other transactions that update the same record around the same time and don't commit immediately? I can duplicate the results you're seeing by doing that. -- Michael Fuhr
