Chris Hoover <revoohc@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This is what is pointing me to a problem with one of the db's. It > appears that the sqlca code has had to of changed between the 7.3.4 > and 8 code and is now behaving in a different (and unexpected) manner. There is no "sqlca" in the backend protocol at all, so I really dunno what is causing the change in behavior. > BTW, which version is correct? Should a no rows return query give a 0 > or a 100? I suspect 100 is correct, but you'd have to go read the ODBC spec to be sure. regards, tom lane
