Re: some databases have not been vacuumed ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No.  Vacuum full should not be necessary on a properly configured
server.

See:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/maintenance.html

On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 15:51, FM wrote:
> I vacumm all DB ...except... postgres ones.
> 
> I"ll do a vacuum -all tonight
> 
> What is you vacuum strategy ?
> vacuum everyday and vacuum full analyse ervery week ?
> 
> thanks !
> 
> 
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > FM wrote:
> > 
> >> Hello after a vacuum full analyse I received this  :
> >> WARNING:  some databases have not been vacuumed in 1805294030 
> >> transactions
> >> HINT:  Better vacuum them within 342189617 transactions, or you may 
> >> have a wraparound failure.
> >>
> >> I read that it's because i do not vacuum DB very often.
> >> Now I vacuum every night but the warning remains.
> >> How can I get rid of this ?
> > 
> > 
> > Run a vacuum full on all the database.
> > 
> >>
> >> Thanks !
> >>
> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >>
> >>               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux