Re: Indexes on RAM disk = insanity?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steve Lane wrote:

All:

We have a postgres 7.4 server where we're trying to achieve some speedups.
Right now, at least superficially, RAM appears to be the bottleneck -- lots
of swaps in and out.

There is another consultant beside myself in the mix and he asked this
question: can we put the database indexes on a RAM disk? Won't that speed
things up?
I am quite wary about putting the indexes on a RAM DISK for another reason.

You say that RAM is your bottleneck, so putting anything unnecessary in RAM seems like a good way to get less performance rather than more. Additionally you have some overhead in tracking the files, etc. and they will remain in RAM even when they are not used. This leaves the system with less effective RAM for the memory intensive operations.

Such a move might make a lot of sense if you had a LOT of RAM but disk I/O was the bottleneck. However, if a lack of RAM is your problem, putting more stuff in RAM doesn't seem very sound to me.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron Technology Consulting


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux