Jeff Frost <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > When I tested with our system, it would not attempt to retrieve that first WAL > via the restore command. All the ones after that it was happy to do it for, > but if that one did not exist, it told me to get lost. Would you be more specific please? Looking at the code, I can't see a reason that the first one would be treated differently from others. What *exactly* did you get? regards, tom lane
