Direct I/O versus OS-Caching

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To:
Subject: Direct I/O versus OS-Caching
From: KÖPFERL Robert <robert.koepferl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:55:21 +0200
Cc: pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Yeah, as the subject quetiones.

What's the better/faster alternative?
Enabling OS-file system caching or disabling it and forcing direct I/O?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Direct I/O versus OS-Caching
  - From: Peter Eisentraut

Prev by Date: Re: How to compare the schemas ?
Next by Date: Re: Direct I/O versus OS-Caching
Previous by thread: Solaris 10 PostgreSQL 8.0.3 SFW package available with SMF
Next by thread: Re: Direct I/O versus OS-Caching
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux