Hello, > I'm more concerned though about the complete experience, i.e. > postgresql performance on Linux vs Bsd vs Windows... > Maintainability.. Stability... os tweeks that were really needed to > make pg work well, etc. > > I would really like to hear from those who have used postgresql on > multiple operating systems.. I've used PostgreSQL on lots of Unixes. Most of the advantages and disadvantages of those are not database-specific. Here are some pro's of each of them: BSDs: centralized, well-organized code management, code well thought-out and readable, especially NetBSD. Good performance and reliability. Linux: supports hardware faster, so if you want to play video games or have rare network cards, use this. Mac OS: pleasing user interface, easier administration for non-technicians, good performance Solaris: superior OS architecture and features, esp. in Solaris 10 (unbeatable diagnostics with dtrace/mdb), high degree of automization (hands-off installation and configuration of everything) Notice: BSD, Linux, and Solaris cost nothing. Mac OS is payware. Sources are available for BSDs, Linux, Mac OS (the "Unix" subset), and (within the next 5 weeks) Solaris. So, if you're a professional, go with NetBSD or Solaris. If you want a system that your grandparents (may they still be living) feel comfortable with, take Mac OS X. Greetings, Rainer
