Re: PG performance comparison vs Oracle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Title: Message
Lee,
 
 
Terse pointers:
 
 
 
1) Some posted already in list. Although, it may have been "performance".
    This question might be better addressed there. YMMV.
 
2) Performance of _what_? Concurrent reads? Single user batch loads?
       DW application? Multitable updates?  "pure" OLTP? "pure" OLAP? 
 
       Finding out "Who is the winner?" requires that you first design a racecourse.
 
 
3) www.tpc.org  (for ideas; no decent PG or MySQL benchmarks I could find there
 
4) Performance is measured against hw, sw budget dollars and also against user
    perceptions. This would be part of the racecourse, IMHO.
 
5)  As a "rule", at extremes of largeness, nothing beats oracle.
 
 
Hope These Help a bit,
 
 
Ross
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lee Wu
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 1:25 PM
To: pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ADMIN] PG performance comparison vs Oracle

Hi all,

 

Anyone has it or point to me the right direction?

 

Thanks,

 

 


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux