--- Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Because almost nobody has complained about the lack > of it. > (I'm talking about actual field experience of there > being a > problem, not somebody objecting that it sounds like > a > feature worth having.) > > It should also be pointed out that we are still > finding bugs in > the integer-datetimes code. This is of course > exactly because > it's not the default --- but I feel sure that the > average user > who notices a difference at all, if we change the > default, > will be much more likely to hit a bug than to > benefit. It certainly did seem like a marginal improvement, but an improvment nontheless, back when we deployed 7.4 (I thing the feature was introduced in 7.3). Now that we've switched to FC3, it was a minor inconvenience to have to rebuild the RPM just for this feature, and I was wondering if there's been enough testing to make it a default. Your answer clearly is "no". Allright. I wonder if the bugs you're finding are serious enough to warrant dumping the data and restoring it to a version without integer-datetimes? Thanks, Murthy __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
