[PATCH 2/2] whymb: Fix staccato of "loads" and typos of "incuring"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 appendix/whymb/whymemorybarriers.tex | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/appendix/whymb/whymemorybarriers.tex b/appendix/whymb/whymemorybarriers.tex
index 01c6a703..57800c10 100644
--- a/appendix/whymb/whymemorybarriers.tex
+++ b/appendix/whymb/whymemorybarriers.tex
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ are up to date (``V'') or not (``I'').
 Initially, the CPU cache lines in which the data would reside are
 in the ``invalid'' state, and the data is valid in memory, as shown
 in step~0.
-In step~1, CPU~0 loads the data at address~0, incuring a cache miss,
+In step~1, CPU~0 loads the data at address~0, incurring a cache miss,
 loading the value into its cache, and transitioning that cache line to
 the ``shared'' state.
 The contents of memory at address~0 remain valid.
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ However, because its cache holds that data in the ``modified'' state,
 CPU~2 can immediately execute that atomic increment without any change
 to cache or memory state.
 
-In step~8.1, CPU~1 loads loads the data at address~0, incuring a cache
+In step~8.1, CPU~1 loads the data at address~0, incurring a cache
 miss.
 Because the data from address~8 is modified in its cache, it must
 first flush that data to memory, transitioning its cache line to
-- 
2.34.1






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux