On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 09:26:14AM -0800, SeongJae Park wrote: > formalregress.tex is using mixed use of SEL4 and seL4. SEL4 is used 8 > times, while seL4 is used twice over the entire repository. Use SEL4 > for the consistency. Note that use of seL4 in swtools.bib is not > changed by this commit. > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx> Nice, thank you! I queued and pushed all but this one. Their website [1] says seL4. At least I *think* that this is their website. Either way, I agree that this should be consistent with their naming. On the Promela/spin change, should a similar change be applied in the Formal Verification chapter? Thanx, Paul [1] https://sel4.systems/ > --- > future/formalregress.tex | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/future/formalregress.tex b/future/formalregress.tex > index b1a39b29..40bf2b35 100644 > --- a/future/formalregress.tex > +++ b/future/formalregress.tex > @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ so they are all yellow with question marks. > Indeed there are! > This table focuses on those that Paul has used, but others are > proving to be useful. > - Formal verification has been heavily used in the seL4 > + Formal verification has been heavily used in the SEL4 > project~\cite{ThomasSewell2013L4binaryVerification}, > and its tools can now handle modest levels of concurrency. > More recently, Catalin Marinas used Lamport's > -- > 2.17.1 > >