[PATCH 08/10] memorder: Remove a redundant sentence for memory barrier strength

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>

A sentence in memorder.tex explains the strength of smp_mb() and its
cost.  Then, a quick quiz having very same answer follows.  Remove the
sentence to reduce the redundancy.

Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 memorder/memorder.tex | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/memorder/memorder.tex b/memorder/memorder.tex
index 5ded6988..bd24b14c 100644
--- a/memorder/memorder.tex
+++ b/memorder/memorder.tex
@@ -1346,8 +1346,6 @@ illustrates this for memory barriers.
 Assuming that both memory barriers are strong enough, if CPU~1's access
 Y1 happens after CPU~0's access Y0, then CPU~1's access X1 is guaranteed
 to happen after CPU~0's access X0.
-When in doubt as to which memory barriers are strong enough, \co{smp_mb()}
-will always do the job, albeit at a price.
 
 \QuickQuiz{
 	How can you tell which memory barriers are strong enough for
-- 
2.17.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux