There seem to be some issues with the description of state transitions.
This patch fixes that.
Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@xxxxxxxxx>
---
together/applyrcu.tex | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/together/applyrcu.tex b/together/applyrcu.tex
index 09a265f7..dee027b9 100644
--- a/together/applyrcu.tex
+++ b/together/applyrcu.tex
@@ -676,11 +676,12 @@ The normal path through this state machine traverses the states CLOSED,
OPEN, CLOSING (with an invocation of \co{call_rcu()}), and back to CLOSED
once the callback has been invoked.
If \co{open()} is invoked before the grace period completes, the
-state machine traverses the cycle OPEN, CLOSING (with an invocation
-of \co{call_rcu()}), and back to CLOSED once the callback has been invoked.
+state machine traverses the cycle OPEN, CLOSING (with
+an invocation of \co{call_rcu()}), REOPENING, and back to OPEN once the
+callback has been invoked.
If \co{open()} and then \co{close()} are invoked before the grace period
completes, the state machine traverses the cycle OPEN, CLOSING (with
-an invocation of \co{call_rcu()}), REOPENING, and back to OPEN once the
+an invocation of \co{call_rcu()}), REOPENING, RECLOSING, and back to CLOSING once the
callback has been invoked.
Given an indefinite alternating sequence of \co{close()} and \co{open()}
--
2.34.1
