On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 21:29:40 +0900 Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 09:10:08 -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > A sectence in 'Microbenchmarking' section is mentioning the remainder of
> > the section will look at ways for dealing with conflicts in measurement
> > error advices. Because we don't distinguish section and subsection on
> > text, this makes it a little confused, whether it means remainder of the
> > subsection, or the following subsections of the section. Make it a bit
> > more clear.
> >
> > Suggedsted-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > debugging/debugging.tex | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/debugging/debugging.tex b/debugging/debugging.tex
> > index b7538620..170bf273 100644
> > --- a/debugging/debugging.tex
> > +++ b/debugging/debugging.tex
> > @@ -641,8 +641,8 @@ sure to take full advantage of any existing test suites available to
> > you.
> > Important as test development is, we must leave further discussion of it
> > to books dedicated to that topic.
> > -The following sections therefore discuss locating bugs in your code given that
> > -you already have a good test suite.
> > +The remainder of this section (\cref{sec:debugging:Performance Estimation})
> > +looks at ways of resolving this conflict.
>
> I think this hunk is misplaced. Existing text around here doesn't
> have any ambiguity. In other words, "The following sections" means
> Sections 11.2 through 11.7 (11.8 is a summary).
Oh, you're right. I may need more coffee, sorry.
>
> >
> > \section{Tracing}
> > \label{sec:debugging:Tracing}
> > @@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ to creep in, including:
> >
> > The first and fourth sources of interference provide conflicting advice,
> > which is one sign that we are living in the real world.
> > -The remainder of this section looks at ways of resolving this conflict.
> > +The following sections look at ways of resolving this conflict.
>
> To my eyes, this sentence now looks redundant as there already is an
> introduction to the following subsections below QQz 11.23.
I agree. I will simply remove this sentence in the next spin.
Thanks,
SJ
>
> >
> > \QuickQuiz{
> > But what about other sources of error, for example, due to
