Hi Akira,
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 11:38:58 +0900 Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 10:21:25 -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > In 'debugging/', 'git' is a command and 'Fixes:' is a string in command
> > output, which usually enclosed via '\co{}', but those are enclosed with
> > '\emph{}'. Use '\co{}' instead for being more consistent.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > debugging/debugging.tex | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/debugging/debugging.tex b/debugging/debugging.tex
> > index 3104bb95..3ce74469 100644
> > --- a/debugging/debugging.tex
> > +++ b/debugging/debugging.tex
> > @@ -862,8 +862,8 @@ by the author's invalid assumptions, and who might also test the code.
> > hackers of harboring???
> > }\QuickQuizAnswer{
> > Those wishing a complete answer to this question are encouraged
> > - to search the Linux kernel \emph{git} repository for commits
>
> I often see "Linux kernel git repository" everywhere, and in this case,
> I suppose emphasizing "git" was the author's intention. Paul might have
> a different opinion, though.
>
> > - containing the string ``Fixes:''.
> > + to search the Linux kernel \co{git} repository for commits
> > + containing the string \co{Fixes:}.
>
> As this is mentioned as a "string", \qco{} might be a better choice.
Thanks, I will revise so in the next spin.
>
> Thanks, Akra
>
> > There were many thousands of them just in the year 2020, including
> > fixes for the following invalid assumptions:
> >
