On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 08:49:46 +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 14:15:22 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> My surprise caused me to beat on it, and it was persistent.
>
> I see. So the "outlier" was the microarchitecture of that
> X5550 (Nehalem), I guess.
> I'd love to reproduce the behavior if at all possible.
>
>>
>> But I cannot find the raw data, either, so maybe I should delete that
>> table. Though I really do like the fact that it is surprising, based
>> on a hope that it convinces readers to expect the unexpected.
>
> That episode would be a good Quick Quiz if the Answer to QQz
> could have a nested QQz inside it.
> Unfortunately that is not possible...
On second thought, it should be possible to put a QQz next to QQz 3.7
citing Table E.1 in the Quiz part.
Let me try and produce a PoC patch.
Thanks, Akira
>
> Thanks, Akira
>
>>
>> Thanx, Paul
>>
>>>> Thanks, Akira
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Strange, but whatever the reason, true! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanx, Paul
