Hi SeongJae,
On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 10:21:24 -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> A quick quiz answer in debugging.tex is wrapping 'time' example outputs
> with `` and ''. Use \co{} instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> debugging/debugging.tex | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/debugging/debugging.tex b/debugging/debugging.tex
> index 4568f90a..3104bb95 100644
> --- a/debugging/debugging.tex
> +++ b/debugging/debugging.tex
> @@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ validation is just job for you.
> consumed in system mode by a CPU-bound program?
> \item Do you have a test case in which all three times
> are zero?
> - \item Do you have a test case in which the ``user'' and ``sys''
> - times sum to more than the ``real'' time?
> + \item Do you have a test case in which the \co{user} and \co{sys}
> + times sum to more than the \co{real} time?
> (This would of course be completely legitimate in
> a multithreaded program.)
> \item Do you have a set of tests cases in which one of the
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ validation is just job for you.
> times uses more than ten seconds?
> \item Do you have a set of test cases in which one of the
> times has non-zero minutes?
> - (For example, ``15m36.342s''.)
> + (For example, \co{15m36.342s}.)
> \item Do you have a set of test cases in which one of the
> times has a seconds value of greater than 60?
> \item Do you have a set of test cases in which one of the
> @@ -279,21 +279,21 @@ validation is just job for you.
> times has a positive minutes value but a negative
> seconds value?
> \item Do you have a set of test cases in which one of the
> - times omits the ``m'' or the ``s''?
> + times omits the \co{m} or the \co{s}?
> \item Do you have a set of test cases in which one of the
> times is non-numeric?
> - (For example, ``Go Fish''.)
> + (For example, \co{Go Fish}.)
My preference is to enclose \co{Go Fish} by quotation marks.
That is easier for me to see it as a string.
There is a convenient macro \qco{} for this purpose. You can say:
+ (For example, \qco{Go Fish}.)
> \item Do you have a set of test cases in which one of the
> lines is omitted?
> - (For example, where there is a ``real'' value and
> - a ``sys'' value, but no ``user'' value.)
> + (For example, where there is a \co{real} value and
> + a \co{sys} value, but no \co{user} value.)
> \item Do you have a set of test cases where one of the
> lines is duplicated?
> Or duplicated, but with a different time value for
> the duplicate?
> \item Do you have a set of test cases where a given line
> has more than one time value?
> - (For example, ``real 0m0.132s 0m0.008s''.)
> + (For example, \co{real 0m0.132s 0m0.008s}.)
Ditto.
With them taken care of,
Reviewed-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, Akira
> \item Do you have a set of test cases containing random
> characters?
> \item In all test cases involving invalid input, did you
