On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 16:26:50 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 08:41:10AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 10:16:32 -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Add missing unbreakable spaces for 'CPUs' and 'elements'.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I queued and pushed, 1/4, 3/4, and 4/4, thank you!
>
> Please do send an updated version of 2/4.
Thank you, and sorry for my mistake. I will send the updated version right
now.
Thanks,
SJ
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > > ---
> > > datastruct/datastruct.tex | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/datastruct/datastruct.tex b/datastruct/datastruct.tex
> > > index 99c92d9a..40ea6995 100644
> > > --- a/datastruct/datastruct.tex
> > > +++ b/datastruct/datastruct.tex
> > [...]
> > > @@ -775,8 +775,8 @@ to about half again faster than that of either QSBR or RCU\@.
> > >
> > > Still unconvinced?
> > > Then look at the log-log plot in
> > > - \cref{fig:datastruct:Read-Only RCU-Protected Hash-Table Performance For Schr\"odinger's Zoo at 448 CPUs; Varying Table Size},
> > > - which shows performance for 448 CPUs as a function of the
> > > + \cref{fig:datastruct:Read-Only RCU-Protected Hash-Table Performance For Schr\"odinger's Zoo at 448~CPUs; Varying Table Size},
> > > + which shows performance for 448~CPUs as a function of the
> > > hash-table size, that is, number of buckets and maximum number
> > > of elements.
> > > A hash-table of size 1,024 has 1,024~buckets and contains
> >
> > This hunk caused an error for me.
> >
> > -----
> > l.6047 ...r's Zoo at 448~CPUs; Varying Table Size}
> > ,
> > ?
> > ! Emergency stop.
> > <to be read again>
> > \protect
> > l.6047 ...r's Zoo at 448~CPUs; Varying Table Size}
> > ,
> > End of file on the terminal!
> > -----
> >
> > Please remove the unbreakable space in \cref{}.
> >
> > Thanks, Akira
> >
> > [...]
