[PATCH -perfbook] advsync/rt: Fold long list in \cite{}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi Paul,

You can break inside \cite{}.
This should be easier to maintain.

        Thanks, Akira
---
 advsync/rt.tex | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/advsync/rt.tex b/advsync/rt.tex
index 58dfc3224cb0..e9db1b04fc37 100644
--- a/advsync/rt.tex
+++ b/advsync/rt.tex
@@ -834,8 +834,13 @@ If configured properly, a non-trivial undertaking, \co{CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL}
 offers real-time threads levels of performance that come close to those of
 bare-metal systems~\cite{AbdullahAljuhni2018nohzfull}.
 \ppl{Fr\'{e}d\'{e}ric}{Weisbecker} produced a practical guide to
-\co{CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL}
-configuration~\cite{FredericWeisbecker2022nohzIntro,FredericWeisbecker2022nohzFullDynticksInternals,FredericWeisbecker2022nohzfull,FredericWeisbecker2022HousekeepingTradeoffs,FredericWeisbecker2022practicalExample,FredericWeisbecker2022nohzfullTSC}.
+\co{CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL} configuration~\cite{
+	FredericWeisbecker2022nohzIntro,
+	FredericWeisbecker2022nohzFullDynticksInternals,
+	FredericWeisbecker2022nohzfull,
+	FredericWeisbecker2022HousekeepingTradeoffs,
+	FredericWeisbecker2022practicalExample,
+	FredericWeisbecker2022nohzfullTSC}.
 
 There has of course been much debate over which of these approaches
 is best for real-time systems, and this debate has been going on for

base-commit: f59c468b212e66597c8f0c594839da53ccd1e949
-- 
2.25.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux