Re: [PATCH] RCU fundamentals: reader is access_route() not read_gptr()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 02:44:26AM -0500, Elad Lahav wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Elad Lahav <e2lahav@xxxxxxxxx>

Good eyes!

I queued and pushed both of them, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  defer/rcufundamental.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/defer/rcufundamental.tex b/defer/rcufundamental.tex
> index 87dfaa95..4abd9d07 100644
> --- a/defer/rcufundamental.tex
> +++ b/defer/rcufundamental.tex
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ It is instead necessary to inform both the compiler and the CPU
>  of the need for care, as can be seen from
>  \cref{fig:defer:Publication/Subscription Constraints},
>  which illustrates interactions between concurrent executions of
> -\co{ins_route()} (and its caller) and \co{read_gptr()} from
> +\co{ins_route()} (and its caller) and \co{access_route()} from
>  \cref{lst:defer:Insertion and Deletion With Concurrent Readers}.
>  
>  The \co{ins_route()} column from
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux