Re: [PATCH] count: Switch from GCC to C11 thread-local storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 07:49:27AM -0400, Elad Lahav wrote:
> On 2022-08-13 07:45, Elad Lahav wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Elad Lahav <e2lahav@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> This one will probably require some back-and-forth. If we change it here, do
> other places need to be updated? Have I now removed the explanation of GCC's
> __thread storage class, which will impact the readability of other sections?
> Or are you ready to take the plunge and convert all code snippets?
> 
> For the record, I did build and test count_end.c.

As long as you continue building and testing, checking the descriptions in
text of the code snippets (in case there is a mention of __thread there),
and verifying that the PDF still builds, as fast as you are willing to go!

Are you seeing the same performance with the new as with the old on
your hardware?  (No statistically significant difference on my laptop,
but figured I should ask.)

							Thanx, Paul



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux