Re: [PATCH] locking: Consistently append parentheses to pthread_cond_wait()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:12:36AM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Some of 'pthread_cond_wait()' mentions have '()' suffix, which indicates
> it's a function, but some mentions don't.  This commit adds the suffix
> to all mentions to be consistent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>

Good eyes!  Queued and pushed, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  locking/locking.tex | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/locking/locking.tex b/locking/locking.tex
> index 14690b19..4ad5e4c4 100644
> --- a/locking/locking.tex
> +++ b/locking/locking.tex
> @@ -528,8 +528,8 @@ prevents hangs due to lost wakeups.
>  
>  	Consider a program that acquires \co{mutex_a}, and then
>  	\co{mutex_b}, in that order, and then passes \co{mutex_a}
> -	to \co{pthread_cond_wait}.
> -	Now, \co{pthread_cond_wait} will release \co{mutex_a}, but
> +	to \co{pthread_cond_wait()}.
> +	Now, \co{pthread_cond_wait()} will release \co{mutex_a}, but
>  	will re-acquire it before returning.
>  	If some other thread acquires \co{mutex_a} in the meantime
>  	and then blocks on \co{mutex_b}, the program will deadlock.
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux