Re: [PATCH-perfbook] count: Fix typos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 08:12:46PM +0100, Johann Klähn wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 17:55 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Queued and pushed, thank you!  I did take the liberty of changing your
> > added "can" to a "nevertheless".  Does that work for you?
> 
> Sure, in that case maybe also remove the second “be”?
> | Atomic increment might be completely acceptable for a two-CPU
> | system, but nevertheless completely inadequate for an eight-CPU system.

Good point in that the sentence is still a bit awkward.  So what I have
done is to add a LaTeX comment that will remind me to think harder
about it.  If I don't get a good replacement by (say) March, please
remind me about it.

							Thanx, Paul



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux