Re: A few terms I'd like to see in perfbook's Glossary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Paul and Akira for correcting me and helping me (who needs to
be improved ;-)) make progress

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 7:39 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 06:42:04AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> > Thanks Paul and Akira
> >
> > great improvement to perfbook's glossary!
> >
> > A question below ;-)
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 4:15 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 06:55:36PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > > > Hi Paul,
> > > >
> > > > While reading through Section 9.5.4, I noticed a few terms
> > > > I'd like to see in perfbook's Glossary.
> > > >
> > > >  - Reference Counter/Counting
> > > >  - Existence Guarantee
> > > >  - Type-safe Memory
> > > >
> > > > "Reference counter" is already mentioned in a couple of existing
> > > > items in the glossary.
> > > >
> > > > "Existing guarantee" might be obvious enough and not worthy
> > > > to be in the glossary.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > There were only a few minor nits in the section.
> > > > Will post a patch taking care of them.
> > >
> > > Thank you for looking it over!  Please see below for a proposed patch
> > > to the glossary.  Oh, and thank you for the checking utilities, very
> > > nice to get explicit messages rather than subtlely broken formatting!!!
> > >
> > > utilities/punctcheck.sh
> > > ./glossary.tex:547:     Type-safe memory\cite{Cheriton96a} is provided by a
> > > utilities/cleverefcheck.sh
> > >
> > >                                                         Thanx, Paul
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > commit a8f5948a1b8921941bf4039e278aa7929f64c322
> > > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date:   Mon Dec 20 09:41:55 2021 -0800
> > >
> > >     glossary: Add reference count, existence guarantee, and TSM
> > >
> > >     Where "TSM" is type-safe memory.
> > >
> > >     Reported-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/glossary.tex b/glossary.tex
> > > index be10f703..31c09232 100644
> > > --- a/glossary.tex
> > > +++ b/glossary.tex
> > > @@ -199,6 +199,14 @@
> > >         increase the overall cost of the computation, resulting in
> > >         linear speedups as threads are added (assuming sufficient
> > >         CPUs are available).
> > > +\item[\IX{Existence Guarantee}:]
> > > +       An existence guarantee is provided by a synchronization mechanism
> > > +       that prevents a given dynamically allocated object from being
> > > +       freed for the duration of that guarantee.
> > > +       For example, RCU provides existence guarantees for the duration
> > > +       of RCU read-side critical sections.
> > > +       A similar but strictly weaker guarantee is provided by
> > > +       type-safe memory.
> > here type-safe memory is called 'weaker'
>
> Type-safe memory is weaker than existence guarantees ...
>
> > >  \item[\IXh{Exclusive}{Lock}:]
> > >         An exclusive lock is a mutual-exclusion mechanism that
> > >         permits only one thread at a time into the
> > > @@ -469,6 +477,11 @@
> > >         A situation in which getting the correct result is not sufficient,
> > >         but where this result must also be obtained within a given amount
> > >         of time.
> > > +\item[\IX{Reference Count}:]
> > > +       A counter that tracks the number of users of a given object or
> > > +       entity.
> > > +       Reference counters provide existence guarantees and are sometimes
> > > +       used to implement garbage collectors.
> > >  \item[\IX{Scalability}:]
> > >         A measure of how effectively a given system is able to utilize
> > >         additional resources.
> > > @@ -531,6 +544,17 @@
> > >         A synchronization mechanism that gathers groups of memory
> > >         accesses so as to execute them atomically from the viewpoint
> > >         of transactions on other CPUs or threads.
> > > +\item[\IX{Type-Safe Memory}:]
> > > +       Type-safe memory~\cite{Cheriton96a} is provided by a
> > > +       synchronization mechanism that prevents a given dynamically
> > > +       allocated object from changing to an incompatible type.
> > > +       Note that the object might well be freed and then reallocated, but
> > > +       the reallocated object is guaranteed to be of a compatible type.
> > > +       Within the Linux kernel, type-safe memory is provided within
> > > +       RCU read-side critical sections for memory allocated from slabs
> > > +       marked with the \co{SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU} flag.
> > > +       The strictly stronger existence guarantee also prevents freeing
> > > +       of the protected object.
> >
> > but why do we use "stronger" here (should not it be "weaker"?)
>
> ... Or, alternatively but equivalently, existence guarantees are stronger
> than type-safe memory.
>
> Is there a better way to word this?
How about this:

It is to note that existence guarantees are stronger than type-safe
memory and.a strictly stronger existence guarantee also prevents
freeing of the protected object.

>
>                                                         Thanx, Paul
>
> > >  \item[\IX{Unteachable}:]
> > >         A topic, concept, method, or mechanism that the teacher does
> > >         not understand well is therefore uncomfortable teaching.
> > Many thanks
> > Zhouyi
Thanks
Zhouyi



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux