On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 03:56:45PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> In answer to Quick Quiz 17.3, MV-RCU should be MV-RLU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Hi Paul,
>
> In answer to Quick Quiz 17.3, MV-RCU should be MV-RLU.
Queued and pushed, good eyes, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks Zhouyi
> --
> future/tm.tex | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/future/tm.tex b/future/tm.tex
> index ce071bc8..50e7d6dc 100644
> --- a/future/tm.tex
> +++ b/future/tm.tex
> @@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ internally~\cite{UCAM-CL-TR-579,KeirFraser2007withoutLocks,Gu:2019:PSE:3358807.3
> \end{enumerate}
>
> It is surprising that the anonymous reviewers of this paper did
> - not demand an apples-to-apples comparison of MV-RCU and RCU\@.
> + not demand an apples-to-apples comparison of MV-RLU and RCU\@.
> Nevertheless, the authors should be congratulated on producing
> an academic paper that presents an all-too-rare example of good
> scalability combined with strong read-side coherence.
> --
> 2.25.1
>
