A sentence explaining common things between 'READ_ONCE()' and
'__atomic_load_n()' provides arguments, but the explanation for
'WRITE_ONCE()' doesn't. This commit makes it also consistently provides
the arguments.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
---
toolsoftrade/toolsoftrade.tex | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/toolsoftrade/toolsoftrade.tex b/toolsoftrade/toolsoftrade.tex
index b2694da2..bc332aba 100644
--- a/toolsoftrade/toolsoftrade.tex
+++ b/toolsoftrade/toolsoftrade.tex
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ primitives.
\cref{chp:Advanced Synchronization: Memory Ordering}.
In the meantime, \co{READ_ONCE(x)} has much in common with
the \GCC\ intrinsic \co{__atomic_load_n(&x, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)}
- and \co{WRITE_ONCE()} has much in common with the \GCC\
+ and \co{WRITE_ONCE(x, v)} has much in common with the \GCC\
intrinsic \co{__atomic_store_n(&x, v, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)}.
}\QuickQuizEndE
}
--
2.17.1
