Re: [PATCH -perfbook] defer: remove superfluous preposition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:17:25PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> Hi, Paul
>  I think preposition 'on' here is superfluous, correct me if I am wrong.
> Best Wishes
> Zhouyi

The current text is technically grammatically correct, but as you
noticed, rather awkward.  I should rework that sentence and the one
following.  Huh.  Actually, I should rework that entire paragraph.

How about the following?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 5eb7525e2f7338ea6b817c145a9b4da60e6871d1
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Jul 20 10:31:03 2021 -0700

    defer/rcufundamental: Wordsmith QQ answer about writes in RCU readers
    
    Reported-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/defer/rcufundamental.tex b/defer/rcufundamental.tex
index 66f9b702..054512e0 100644
--- a/defer/rcufundamental.tex
+++ b/defer/rcufundamental.tex
@@ -330,12 +330,17 @@ greater detail in \cref{sec:memorder:RCU}.
 	\co{P1()}'s grace period.
 
 	It might seem strange to have RCU read-side critical sections
-	containing writes, but RCU is just fine with this.
-	This capability is used frequently in the Linux kernel, for
-	example, acquiring a lock on or reference to a data structure.
-	Acquiring either a lock or a reference results in a write
-	to memory, and it is OK to do these within an RCU read-side
-	critical section.
+	containing writes, but this capability is not only permitted,
+	but also highly useful.
+	For example, the Linux kernel frequently carries out an
+	RCU-protected traversal of a linked data structure and then
+	acquires a reference to the destination data element.
+	Because this data element must not be freed in the meantime,
+	that element's reference counter must necessarily be incremented
+	within the traversal's RCU read-side critical section.
+	However, that increment entails a write to memory.
+	Therefore, it is a very good thing that memory writes are
+	permitted within RCU read-side critical sections.
 
 	If having writes in RCU read-side critical sections still seems
 	strange, please review



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux