Re: [PATCH -perfbook] future/htm: Remove ref to Tabel 17.3 in QQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 10:52:21AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> Table 17.3 is not available in EBook-size builds.
> For compatibility, remove reference to the combined table in Quick
> Quiz added in commit 279c38a988f9 ("future/htm: Add some HTM
> hardware-reliability anecdotes").
> 
> Fixes: 279c38a988f9 ("future/htm: Add some HTM hardware-reliability anecdotes")
> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>

Good catch, queued and pushed, thank you!

> ---
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Current master fails to build "eb".
> I think reference to Table 17.3 is not essential to the Quick Quiz
> and just removed it.
> If you think otherwise, it can be made conditional by \IfEbookSize{}{}.
> 
>         Thanks, Akira
> 
> PS: As for hardware implementation of transactional memory,
> Power ISA v3.1 deprecated it [1].
> It might be worth mentioning it in the Answer to the QQ.
> In the post specter world, it looks like almost impossible for hardware
> designers to come up with a secure implementation of HTM...
> 
> [1]: Appendix A of Power ISA v3.1 at
>     https://ibm.ent.box.com/s/hhjfw0x0lrbtyzmiaffnbxh2fuo0fog0

Thank you for bringing this to my attention!  I have added it in
with your Suggested-by.

							Thanx, Paul

> --
>  future/htm.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/future/htm.tex b/future/htm.tex
> index abc80daf..3ff9bf24 100644
> --- a/future/htm.tex
> +++ b/future/htm.tex
> @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ tab:future:Comparison of Locking (Augmented by RCU or Hazard Pointers) and HTM}.
>  }
>  
>  \QuickQuiz{
> -	\Cref{tab:future:Comparison of Locking and HTM,tab:future:Comparison of Locking (Plain and Augmented) and HTM,tab:future:Comparison of Locking (Augmented by RCU or Hazard Pointers) and HTM}
> +	\Cref{tab:future:Comparison of Locking and HTM,tab:future:Comparison of Locking (Augmented by RCU or Hazard Pointers) and HTM}
>  	state that hardware is only starting to become available.
>  	But hasn't HTM hardware support been widely available
>  	for almost a full decade?
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux