On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:51:37 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:26:23AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Hmm...
>>
>> In the attached akiyks.patch, there are [PATCH RFC 1/2] and [PATCH RFC 2/2].
>> and the [PATCH RFC 1/2] wouldn't apply due to missing Balbir's RFC PATCH.
>>
>> Or do you want me to check if there is any damage in some of the 7 patches
>> I sent out?
>>
>> I think starting from [PATCH -perfbook 1/5], the patch set should work.
>>
>> Or what am I missing???
>
> You are quite right, my fault entirely.
>
> Some days it just doesn't pay to take hold of the keyboard. :-/
;-) ;-) ;-)
>
> Anyway, back to the original question, it looks pretty good, though
> some of the larger tables (17.1, for example) are truncated. Which
> I suspect you were saying earlier when talking about shrinking things.
Yes, that's the current situation.
I was hoping Balbir could do further adjustments of remaining large
floats based on the scheme in this patch set.
Thanks, Akira
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
