>From a4f6e08b2ef23b39eed420e0f1595affbb624c5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:29:17 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] count: Reduce width of performance table
Reperesent algorithm names by unique part of their path names.
To shrink vertical spaces in the heading, use "picture" environment
and tweak placement manually.
By this change, the table now fits the 1c width and we can get rid
of \OneColumnHSpace{}.
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
---
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 10:09:22 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Another thing would be to make the "Algorithms" heading be something
> like "Algorithms: \co{count_*.c}", then trim the leading "count_" and
> trailing ".c" from each row's first column. Would that make sense?
This patch manages to do the tweak.
It might be over-engineering to do this level of tuning in the header.
But at least it looks much better than what it would do without using
\multirow{} and "picture" environment.
As you said, there might be alternative to do this at a higher level
of LaTeX code. I'll see to it (with lower priority).
Thanks, Akira
>
> Thanx, Paul
--
count/count.tex | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/count/count.tex b/count/count.tex
index 1a8d7bf3..3820a551 100644
--- a/count/count.tex
+++ b/count/count.tex
@@ -2817,36 +2817,40 @@ will expand on these lessons.
\rowcolors{4}{}{lightgray}
\renewcommand*{\arraystretch}{1.1}
\small
-\centering\OneColumnHSpace{-.35in}
+\centering
\newcommand{\NA}{\cellcolor{white}}
\begin{tabular}{lrcS[table-format=2.1]S[table-format=3.0]S[table-format=4.0]
S[table-format=6.0]S[table-format=6.0]}
\toprule
- & & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{picture}(6,50)(0,-24)\rotatebox{90}{Exact?}\end{picture}} &
- \multicolumn{1}{c}{Updates} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Reads (ns)} \\
+ \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{picture}(60,15)(0,-3)\put(0,0){Algorithm}
+ \put(14,-10){(\path{count_*.c})}\end{picture}} &
+ & \multirow{2}{*}{\begin{picture}(6,50)(0,-24)\rotatebox{90}{Exact?}\end{picture}} &
+ \multicolumn{1}{c}{\multirow{2}{*}{\begin{picture}(30,15)(0,-3)
+ \put(0,0){Updates}\put(15,-10){(ns)}\end{picture}}} &
+ \multicolumn{4}{c}{Reads (ns)} \\
\cmidrule{5-8}
- Algorithm & Section & & \multicolumn{1}{c}{(ns)} &
+ & Section & & &
\multicolumn{1}{r}{1 CPU} &
\multicolumn{1}{r}{8 CPUs} &
\multicolumn{1}{r}{64 CPUs} &
\multicolumn{1}{r}{420 CPUs} \\
\midrule
- \path{count_stat.c} & \ref{sec:count:Array-Based Implementation} & \NA &
+ \path{stat} & \ref{sec:count:Array-Based Implementation} & \NA &
6.3 & 294 & 303 & 315 & 612 \\
- \path{count_stat_eventual.c} & \ref{sec:count:Eventually Consistent Implementation} & \NA &
+ \path{stat_eventual} & \ref{sec:count:Eventually Consistent Implementation} & \NA &
6.4 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\
- \path{count_end.c} & \ref{sec:count:Per-Thread-Variable-Based Implementation} & \NA &
+ \path{end} & \ref{sec:count:Per-Thread-Variable-Based Implementation} & \NA &
2.9 & 301 & 6 309 & 147 594 & 239 683 \\
- \path{count_end_rcu.c} & \ref{sec:together:RCU and Per-Thread-Variable-Based Statistical Counters} & \NA &
+ \path{end_rcu} & \ref{sec:together:RCU and Per-Thread-Variable-Based Statistical Counters} & \NA &
2.9 & 454 & 481 & 508 & 2 317 \\
\midrule
- \path{count_lim.c} & \ref{sec:count:Simple Limit Counter Implementation} &
+ \path{lim} & \ref{sec:count:Simple Limit Counter Implementation} &
N & 3.2 & 435 & 6 678 & 156 175 & 239 422 \\
- \path{count_lim_app.c} & \ref{sec:count:Approximate Limit Counter Implementation} &
+ \path{lim_app} & \ref{sec:count:Approximate Limit Counter Implementation} &
N & 2.4 & 485 & 7 041 & 173 108 & 239 682 \\
- \path{count_lim_atomic.c} & \ref{sec:count:Atomic Limit Counter Implementation} &
+ \path{lim_atomic} & \ref{sec:count:Atomic Limit Counter Implementation} &
Y & 19.7 & 513 & 7 085 & 199 957 & 239 450 \\
- \path{count_lim_sig.c} & \ref{sec:count:Signal-Theft Limit Counter Implementation} &
+ \path{lim_sig} & \ref{sec:count:Signal-Theft Limit Counter Implementation} &
Y & 4.7 & 519 & 6 805 & 120 000 & 238 811 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
--
2.17.1
