>From 79832886d01cd0e9e5d491132528dba83440a548 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 09:03:44 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] count: Update CPU type/system
We are now talking about results obrained on an x86 system.
Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
---
count/count.tex | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/count/count.tex b/count/count.tex
index 4b01bc75..6430abd5 100644
--- a/count/count.tex
+++ b/count/count.tex
@@ -2934,7 +2934,7 @@ courtesy of eventual consistency.
Table~\ref{tab:count:Limit Counter Performance on x86}
shows the performance of the parallel limit-counting algorithms.
Exact enforcement of the limits incurs a substantial performance
-penalty, although on this 4.7\,GHz \Power{6} system that penalty can be reduced
+penalty, although on this x86 system that penalty can be reduced
by substituting signals for atomic operations.
All of these implementations suffer from read-side lock contention
in the face of concurrent readers.
--
2.17.1
