Re: [PATCH] memorder: Fix typo (Figure -> Table)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 11:19 PM Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From 57730b6cd92ed03f1f7c32defa19fc8a57586950 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 00:17:47 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] memorder: Fix typo (Figure -> Table)
>
> "Summary of Memory Ordering" referred from the footnote added in
> commit efc3ce7e8d5d ("memorder: Add a brief description of the use
> of multicopy atomicity") is actually a table. Fix it.
>
> Cc: Junchang Wang <junchangwang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  memorder/memorder.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/memorder/memorder.tex b/memorder/memorder.tex
> index 69ce196..943c3af 100644
> --- a/memorder/memorder.tex
> +++ b/memorder/memorder.tex
> @@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@ CPUs agree on the order of all stores.\footnote{
>         As of late 2018, ARMv8 and x86 provide other-multicopy atomicity,
>         IBM mainframe provides fully multicopy atomicity, and PPC does
>         not provide multicopy atomicity at all. More detail is shown in
> -       Figure~\ref{tab:memorder:Summary of Memory Ordering}.}
> +       Table~\ref{tab:memorder:Summary of Memory Ordering}.}

Indeed! That's my fault. Thanks, Akira!

--Junchang

>  This means that if only a subset of CPUs are doing stores, the
>  other CPUs will agree on the order of stores, hence the ``other''
>  in ``other-multicopy atomicity''.
> --
> 2.7.4
>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux