Signed-off-by: Junchang Wang <junchangwang@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi list,
There are a few typos in Section Partitioning. Please take a look.
Thanks,
--Junchang
--
SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex b/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
index 7b4f6eb..562c057 100644
--- a/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
+++ b/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
@@ -936,7 +936,7 @@ We could simply assign each CPU one gigabyte of memory, and allow
each CPU to access its own private chunk of memory, without the
need for locking and its complexities and overheads.
Unfortunately, this simple scheme breaks down if an algorithm happens
-to have CPU~0 allocate all of the memory and CPU~1 the free it, as
+to have CPU~0 allocate all of the memory and CPU~1 free it, as
would happen in a simple producer-consumer workload.
The other extreme, code locking, suffers from excessive lock contention
@@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ smaller than the number of non-\co{NULL} pointers.
The allocation function \co{memblock_alloc()} may be seen in
Listing~\ref{lst:SMPdesign:Allocator-Cache Allocator Function}.
Line~\lnref{pick} picks up the current thread's per-thread pool,
-and line~8 check to see if it is empty.
+and line~\lnref{chk:empty} checks to see if it is empty.
If so, lines~\lnref{ack}-\lnref{rel} attempt to refill it
from the global pool
--
2.7.4
