On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 11:47:17PM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote:
> perfbook/toolsoftrade/toolsoftrade.tex says:
>
> For example, ``\co{memory_order_explicit(&a, memory_order_relaxed)}''
> is vaguely similar to the Linux kernel's ``\co{READ_ONCE()}''
>
> I'm no expert on the C11 atomics, but as far as I can see, there is no
> such function as "memory_order_explicit". Did you perhaps mean to say
> "atomic_load_explicit"?
Indeed I did, good catch, thank you! I have applied a fix with your
Reported-by.
Thanx, Paul
