On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 08:19:22AM +0900, SeongJae Park wrote: > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx> Good eyes, both applied, thank you! Thanx, Paul > --- > future/QC.tex | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/future/QC.tex b/future/QC.tex > index d16c080..f985437 100644 > --- a/future/QC.tex > +++ b/future/QC.tex > @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ ten digits of precision. > If this was all that QC provided, QC would be a rather slow and very > low-quality analog computer. > Given that digital computers obsoleted analog computers some decades back, > -This analogy might lead many developers to ignore QC and to > +this analogy might lead many developers to ignore QC and to > use classic-computing floating point instead. > However, QC provides a powerful capability covered in the next section. > > @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ For example, perhaps machine-learning techniques will allow difficult > cases to be detected so that alternative solution methods can be applied > as needed. > > -Of course, much of this work has been heuristic and/or probabalistic, > +Of course, much of this work has been heuristic and/or probabilistic, > so it might at first glance seem unfair to compare them to > QC algorithms. > However, QC algorithms are inherently probabilistic due to error rates > -- > 2.10.0 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
