Re: [PATCH] advsync: Fix store-buffering sequence table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 07:15:24AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On 2017/07/05 10:32:49 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

[ . . . ]

> >>> So I cannot go with "volatile", but let's see if I can do something
> >>> better than the gcc intrinsics.
> >>
> >> And if the litmus7 guys don't have anything for me, I can always write a
> >> script to do the conversions.  So either way, we will have kernel-style
> >> notation at some point.  ;-)
> > 
> > And it turns out that the contents of a second "{}" in a litmus7 test
> > is pulled directly into the output code, so an easy change.  ;-)
> 
> Good news!
> 
> So __atomic_thread_fence() will also be replaced with smp_mb() in
> the litmus tests? That will reduce the width of the tables and eliminate
> the need for the hspece adjustments in one-column layout.

Oops, I forgot to push!  Done now.

And yes, there is now smp_mb() in the litmus tests and the tables.

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux