On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 07:21:06AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > On 2017/02/08 13:41:53 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 06:36:18AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > >> > >> > >> Akira > >> (from mobile, might be QP encoded) > >> > >>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 6:10, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:57:23AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 1:37, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:54:41PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > >>>>>>> From 58a0655ab2b5c555bd19a6d7624a9d4413cf1360 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >>>>>> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 23:34:47 +0900 > >>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Bibliography update round 5 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Paul, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here is round 5 of bibliography updates. > >>>>>> Patches 1, 2, and 3 take care of broken urls. Patch 2 contains an > >>>>>> alternative link to a webpage capture. > >>>>>> Patch 4 is cosmetic fix of UCB in author fields > >>>>>> Patch 5 is a different type of update. It adds awareness of "location" > >>>>>> field in "inproceedings" entry. Please see the commit log for details. > >>>>>> I think this is a reasonable change for perfbook. > >>>>> > >>>>> I applied the first four, and might be convinced to apply the fifth. > >>>>> But first a question -- how many changes would be required to bring > >>>>> my old bib entries in line with current practice? > >>>> > >>>> No change is required. Because this change has effect > >>>> only on entries with both "address" and "location". > >>>> I thought I explained this somewhere, but missed to do so. > >>>> Can this clarification convince you? > >>> > >>> Ah, thank you for the clarification! And on to the next question... > >>> > >>> Does it really make sense for me to have both "address" and "location" > >>> on a given bib entry? If I am doing something strange (quite likely!), > >>> it is probably better for me to fix my strange bib entries than to modify > >>> the tools. Especially given the possibility that others might well > >>> harvest bib entries from perfbook. > >> > >> Well, I don't think your usage of "address" field is strange at all. > >> It would be easy to find people who do the same. > >> > >> The fact that genuine alpha style does not recognize "location" entry would support my observation. > > > > Sorry to continue with the questions, but should perfbook be using > > some other bibliography style? The current "alpha" was pretty much an > > arbitrary choice. > > Hmm... > For example, there is a Q&A here: > http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/76566/ > > This answer recommends to use "venue" field for location. > > Another Q&A: > http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/152725/ > > There seems to be no popular consensus how to handle location of conference > in bibliography... > > Thoughts? Yow!!! ;-) I will take your updated patch, adding the above two URLs if they are not already present. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
