Re: [PATCH 0/5] Bibliography update round 5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oops, sent prematurely.
Hope you can see what I mean.

Akira

> On Feb 9, 2017, at 6:36, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Akira 
> (from mobile, might be QP encoded)
> 
>>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 6:10, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:57:23AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 1:37, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:54:41PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>>>>>> From 58a0655ab2b5c555bd19a6d7624a9d4413cf1360 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 23:34:47 +0900
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Bibliography update round 5
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Paul,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here is round 5 of bibliography updates.
>>>>> Patches 1, 2, and 3 take care of broken urls. Patch 2 contains an
>>>>> alternative link to a webpage capture.
>>>>> Patch 4 is cosmetic fix of UCB in author fields
>>>>> Patch 5 is a different type of update. It adds awareness of "location"
>>>>> field in "inproceedings" entry. Please see the commit log for details.
>>>>> I think this is a reasonable change for perfbook.
>>>> 
>>>> I applied the first four, and might be convinced to apply the fifth.
>>>> But first a question -- how many changes would be required to bring
>>>> my old bib entries in line with current practice?
>>> 
>>> No change is required. Because this change has effect
>>> only on entries with both "address" and "location".
>>> I thought I explained this somewhere, but missed to do so.
>>> Can this clarification convince you?
>> 
>> Ah, thank you for the clarification!  And on to the next question...
>> 
>> Does it really make sense for me to have both "address" and "location"
>> on a given bib entry?  If I am doing something strange (quite likely!),
>> it is probably better for me to fix my strange bib entries than to modify
>> the tools.  Especially given the possibility that others might well
>> harvest bib entries from perfbook.
>> 
> 
> Well, I don't think your usage of "address" field is strange at all.
> It would be easy to find people who do the same.
> 
> The fact that genuine alpha style does not recognize "location" entry would support my observation.
> 
>> After all, some of my bib entries were old enough to drink almost a
>> decade ago.  I guess we can only be thankful that they are unable
>> to do any driving.  ;-)
>> 
>>                           Thanx, Paul
>> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux