Re: [PATCH 17/17] formal/dyntickrcu: Shorten too long code line length

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2016/09/21 11:44:48 +0900, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > Lines 19 and 39 of dyntickRCU-irqnn-ssl.spin is too long.  This commit
> > shortens the lines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  formal/dyntickrcu.tex | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/formal/dyntickrcu.tex b/formal/dyntickrcu.tex
> > index e31996d..922e556 100644
> > --- a/formal/dyntickrcu.tex
> > +++ b/formal/dyntickrcu.tex
> > @@ -1272,46 +1272,48 @@ The \co{grace_period()} process then becomes as follows:
> >   16   :: 1 ->
> >   17     atomic {
> >   18       assert(!shouldexit);
> > - 19       shouldexit = dyntick_nohz_done && dyntick_irq_done;
> > - 20       curr = dynticks_progress_counter;
> > - 21       if
> > - 22       :: (curr - snap) >= 2 || (curr & 1) == 0 ->
> > - 23         break;
> > - 24       :: else -> skip;
> > - 25       fi;
> > - 26     }
> > - 27   od;
> > - 28   gp_state = GP_DONE;
> > - 29   gp_state = GP_IDLE;
> > - 30   atomic {
> > - 31     shouldexit = 0;
> > - 32     snap = dynticks_progress_counter;
> > - 33     gp_state = GP_WAITING;
> > - 34   }
> > - 35   do
> > - 36   :: 1 ->
> > - 37     atomic {
> > - 38       assert(!shouldexit);
> > - 39       shouldexit = dyntick_nohz_done && dyntick_irq_done;
> > - 40       curr = dynticks_progress_counter;
> > - 41       if
> > - 42       :: (curr != snap) || ((curr & 1) == 0) ->
> > - 43         break;
> > - 44       :: else -> skip;
> > - 45       fi;
> > - 46     }
> > - 47   od;
> > - 48   gp_state = GP_DONE;
> > - 49 }
> > + 19       shouldexit = dyntick_nohz_done &&
> > + 20                        dyntick_irq_done;
> > + 21       curr = dynticks_progress_counter;
> > + 22       if
> > + 23       :: (curr - snap) >= 2 || (curr & 1) == 0 ->
> > + 24         break;
> > + 25       :: else -> skip;
> > + 26       fi;
> > + 27     }
> > + 28   od;
> > + 29   gp_state = GP_DONE;
> > + 30   gp_state = GP_IDLE;
> > + 31   atomic {
> > + 32     shouldexit = 0;
> > + 33     snap = dynticks_progress_counter;
> > + 34     gp_state = GP_WAITING;
> > + 35   }
> > + 36   do
> > + 37   :: 1 ->
> > + 38     atomic {
> > + 39       assert(!shouldexit);
> > + 40       shouldexit = dyntick_nohz_done &&
> > + 41                        dyntick_irq_done;
> > + 42       curr = dynticks_progress_counter;
> > + 43       if
> > + 44       :: (curr != snap) || ((curr & 1) == 0) ->
> > + 45         break;
> > + 46       :: else -> skip;
> > + 47       fi;
> > + 48     }
> > + 49   od;
> > + 50   gp_state = GP_DONE;
> > + 51 }
> >  \end{verbatim}
> >  }
> >
> >  The implementation of \co{grace_period()} is very similar
> >  to the earlier one.
> >  The only changes are the addition of line~10 to add the new
> > -interrupt-count parameter, changes to lines~19 and~39 to
> > +interrupt-count parameter, changes to lines~19-20 and~40-41 to
> >  add the new \co{dyntick_irq_done} variable to the liveness
> > -checks, and of course the optimizations on lines~22 and~42.
> > +checks, and of course the optimizations on lines~23 and~44.
> >
> >  This model (\path{dyntickRCU-irqnn-ssl.spin})
> >  results in a correct verification with roughly half a million
> >
>
> Instead of modifying the code, you can specify a proper font size
> for this instance, e.g.,
>
> > @@ -1252,7 +1252,7 @@ and finally lines~32-43 model \co{rcu_irq_exit()}.
> >
> >  The \co{grace_period} process then becomes as follows:
> >
> > -{ \scriptsize
> > +{ \fontsize{6.7pt}{8pt}\selectfont
> >  \begin{verbatim}
> >    1 proctype grace_period()
> >    2 {
>
> I once did a similar tweak in commit bc0fd9d40035 ("after: Tweak font
> size of Figure A.2").


Yes, it would be much better.  Thanks for your comment!
I will send the patch again in reply to this mail.


Thanks,
SeongJae Park

>
>
>                                            Thanks, Akira
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux