On 2016/09/11 1:28, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 09:19:32AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: >> On 2016/09/08 04:16:22 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:58:53AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: >>>> On 2016/09/08 0:47, Akira Yokosawa wrote: >>>>> >From 480c37c4749ae4957791636e84e77566265613c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 00:20:29 +0900 >>>>> Subject: [PATCH] TRIAL: Indentation tweaks around 'verbbox' environment >>>>> >>>>> This is a trial commit to avoid the side-effect of the "verbbox" >>>>> environment, i.e., when it is used just after a section heading, >>>>> the following paragraph loses implicit non-indentation. >>>>> >>>>> This commit moves such a "verbbox" environment *before* the section >>>>> heading. >>>>> >>>>> There are also cases where two "verbbox" environments are placed just >>>>> after section headings. To accommodate such cases, one of such >>>>> "verbbox" need to be replaced with "myverbbox" environment to give >>>>> another temporary verbatimbox content holder. >>>>> >>>>> This commit includes an example of such a case. >>>>> >>>>> Note that the "myverbbox" environment is provided in recent versions >>>>> of the "verbatimbox" package, namely after v3.0. >>>>> >>>>> If you have older versions of "verbatimbox" package, you need to >>>>> update. Also the newer one requires the "readarray" package. >>>>> >>>>> Please make sure you have those required packages. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> defer/toyrcu.tex | 31 +++++++++++++++++-------------- >>>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Paul, >>>> >>>> So, this is what occurred to me. >>>> The main idea is to move "verbbox" environment before the section heading. >>>> This patch contains only a small samples. >>>> Does this level of modification acceptable in your viewpoint? >>>> >>>> One concern is the requirement of fairly new "verbatimbox" environment. >>>> On Ubuntu 12.04, the one installed in texlive is too old. >>>> On Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04, it contains newer versions. >>> >>> I am currently running Ubuntu 14.04, so it would work. But is there >>> anything that could be done to make "verbbox" avoid causing this change? >>> >> >> So I tried several modification of verbatimbox.sty to do so. >> But what I could do was to add a variant of "verbbox" named "verbboxh" >> which passes "afterheading"-ness to the next paragraph. >> >> The way to do this can be found at >> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/23265/suppressing-indentation-of-the-next-paragraph >> >> But when I made the same change to "verbbox" without \@afterindentfalse to >> make it "afterheading"-ness aware, the resulting pdf looked weird with irregular >> vertical spacing before section headings. >> >> It's far beyond my capability to figure out how to fix this. >> >> Using the variant "verbboxh" in the LaTeX sources would be essentially the >> same as adding explicit \noindent's from a maintainer's viewpoint. >> >> So moving the position of "verbbox" environment seems a good compromise for now. >> And by doing so, the position would be a good reminder of the side-effect. >> >> What do you think? > > Would it make sense to file a bug report against verbbox and wait until > the bug is fixed? > Well, it seems like we don't need to file a bug report. We can use "verbbox" env within a "figure" env, and doing so, the "afterheading"-ness of the first paragraph can be preserved. I'll compose a sample patch for you to confirm this. Without your encouragement to let me avoid invasive modifications, I could not have noticed this. Thanks, Akira > Thanx, Paul > >> Thanks, Akira >> >> >>> Thanx, Paul >>> >>> >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
