Re: [PATCH] treewide: Add \noindent where necessary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016/09/04 02:58:21 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 08:44:27AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>> >From e11254e95c6d33eaf999a1e1c4831af2e141fb91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 08:01:50 +0900
>> Subject: [PATCH] treewide: Add \noindent where necessary
>>
>> Since commit 213f584cd55b ("Add a few epigraphs") and following
>> commits, implicit no-indentation of first paragraph of a Chapter
>> has been lost.
>>
>> This commit adds explicit "\noindent" after \epigraph{}s.
>>
>> It also adds "\noindent" where some environment is used just
>> after "\section{}", "subsection{}", or "subsubsection{}.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Good eyes!  I honestly had not noticed.

Well, now I know why.  In the two-column layout, there was no change
in indentation of the first paragraph of a chapter...
I suppose you mostly see the two-column layout so it's natural you
didn't see any difference.

I don't know why, but when you specify "twocolumn" option to the "book"
documentclass, the first paragraph of a chapter *is* indented.

I noticed the difference in perfbook-1c.pdf first, and wrongly assumed
it was also the case in two-column layout.

Sorry for my confusion.

I have no idea if the behavior of twocolumn option is intended or not.

So the addition of epigraphs actually made the indentation consistent
in both two-column and one-column layout.

I can resubmit a patch that only changes at the first paragraphs of
sections.

> 
> But wouldn't it make more sense to fix the epigraph package?  For that
> matter, what exactly are the rules regarding epigraphs and indentation
> of first paragraphs and chapters?

\epigraph{} command does have this side-effect in one-column layout.
I found several examples where people use \noindent after \epigraph{},
but there seems to be no strong rules here.

So just doing consistently can be said of as the rule.
It's the editor's call, I think.

                                                Thanks.
 
> 							Thanxx, Paul
> 
[snip]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux