On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 21:02 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 10:32:26AM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote: > > > > From: Balbir singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:26:34 +1000 > > Subject: [PATCH] Correct a sample in memorybarriers.tex > > > > We probably don't want to show GFP_KERNEL allocation > > under spin_lock, GFP_ATOMIC seems much better. > > > > Signed-off-by: Balbir singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx> > Good catch, applied, thank you! > > However, I had to apply this by hand due to some recent mass changes to > figures containing code. Could you please move to current perfbook.git > for future submissions? > > Thanx, Paul I thought I did a git pull before patching. My git-head pointed to 413b7bc1cf6d65368300e96016ac15ac728b66fd I'll double check. Thanks for applying it by hand Balbir Singh. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
