On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:49:16PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >From aa7969fe4675ab8ee3c7da0470b04f90574b641c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 20:31:20 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] Tweak width of epigraph for two-column layout
>
> The default of \epigraphwidth is .5\textwidth.
> It is too wide for two-column layout.
> This commit modifies it to .65\columnwidth for two-column
> layout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
I am not so sure about this. For example, see Chapter 3's epigraph,
which ends up with a separate line for the last word. Ditto for the
"Glossary and Bibliography", and Appendix A.
Chapter 16 ends up with a piled-high epigraph, as does Chapter 7.
Of course, the one-column version has similarly compressed epigraphs.
So I am wondering if it might be better to leave the two-column
epigraph width alone and to expand the single-column epigraph width.
Thoughts?
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> perfbook.tex | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/perfbook.tex b/perfbook.tex
> index 9216485..24fffc6 100644
> --- a/perfbook.tex
> +++ b/perfbook.tex
> @@ -102,6 +102,10 @@
> \setlength{\evensidemargin}{-4pt}
> }{}
>
> +\IfTwoColumn{
> +\setlength{\epigraphwidth}{0.65\columnwidth}
> +}{}
> +
> \setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}
>
> \frontmatter
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
