Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] qqz: Improve accuracy of cross-links

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016/04/24 10:08, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>>From 6ecb00b37832372d18cdc7ff5eaea9a53eab3cb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiysw@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:19:20 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] qqz: Improve accuracy of cross-links
> 
> In commit 33b93f8258f5 ("qqz: Cross-link questions and answers"),
> cross-links of quick quizzes and their answers were implemented.
> However it uses the \stepcounter{} command, and direct references
> of 'quickquizctr' counter is not output to the .aux file.
> The symptom is when you click on a hyperlink in the resulting PDF,
> you jump to a random nearby label such as that of Figure, Table,
> or Section, etc. which happens just before the \label{} using
> 'quickquizctr'.
> 
> By using \refstepcounter{} instead and using 2 counters
> 'quickquizctr' and 'quickquizctrC' ('C' stands for 'Chapter'),
> each of which is automatically reset at a new chapter and
> a new section respectively, and defining \theHNum at the head
> of qqz.sty, then redefining it within the \QuickQuizAnsers
> command, matching QQ.n.m's and QQA.n.m's are output to the .aux
> file correctly.
> 
> By applying this change, resulting hyperlinks become to jump to
> places almost exactly where you'd expect.
> 
> This change may have the effect of increasing the required number
> of 'pdflatex' iterations to get a final result. The following
> commit will take care of it.
> 
> This commit also updates the copyright notices in the header,
> including the name of Paolo Bonzini who authored the commit
> mentioned above.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiysw@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi, Paul.

I noticed there really is a change in the behavior of hyperref's of
Chapters. They used to jump to the top of the pages, but after
this patch is applied, they jump to the bottom of the Chapter titles.
So you need to scroll a little to see the title of the Chapters.

I think this is a regression caused by this patch.

If you do think so, please keep from pushing this series out.

Or the benefit of the patch is big enough compared to the change
of the behavior?

                                            Regards, Akira
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux